According to God of Prompt on Twitter, recent findings show that Theory of Mind (ToM) predicts collaborative performance with AI like GPT-4, but has no correlation with solo task performance (source: @godofprompt, Dec 7, 2025). This indicates that success with AI tools relies heavily on collaborative intuition rather than simply using prompt templates. Users who treat AI as an intelligent collaborator—anticipating misunderstandings, clarifying context, and aligning goals—achieve significantly better results than those who treat AI as a passive tool. The business implication is that organizations should prioritize developing collaborative AI skills among employees instead of focusing solely on static benchmarks like MMLU scores. GPT-4o, for example, boosted human performance by 29 percentage points, while Llama 3.1 8b improved it by 23 points, emphasizing the value of human-AI synergy over standalone AI metrics. This trend highlights a market opportunity for training, consulting, and tooling aimed at enhancing collaborative AI workflows and unlocking greater productivity gains (source: @godofprompt, Dec 7, 2025).